ashenWe’ve spoken about New Balance before. Particularly the New Balance hiking shoes model 669V2, 1450 etc. Honestly, they may be one of the very few manufacturers who don’t receive many complaints about sizing. New Balance 880 vs 1080 became a much explored topic recently because they both have almost identical specs yet serve two different purposes. The 1080 is designed primarily for neutral runners looking for a balance between softness and responsiveness during longer runs. The 880 is designed for everyday training. That’s the bottom line but there is much more to explore.
New Balance 880 vs 1080 Specs
| 880 | 1080 | |
| Weight | Men’s version: Around 10.5 ounces Women’s version: Around 9.1 ounces | Men’s version: Around 9.3 ounces Women’s version: Around 8.1 ounces |
| Midsole | Fresh Foam X in the heel and FuelCell foam in the forefoot | Fresh Foam X |
| Upper | Engineered Mesh Upper and Padded Tongue and Collar | Hypoknit Mesh Upper and UltraHeel |
| Outsole | Blown Rubber Outsole | Blown Rubber Outsole |
| Support Type | Neutral | Neutral |
We can see that the specs are almost similar except for a few key differences that change the buyers perspective. Starting off from the midsole technology, both the shoes are equipped with Fresh Foam X. This is New Balance’s premium cushioning system, designed to provide a softer underfoot feel while maintaining responsiveness. Though the Fresh Foam X is generally softer than previous versions, it still offers a decent bounce-back or energy return, particularly for a shoe in the max-cushion category. The 1080 heel design enhances comfort by reducing pressure and irritation, while still offering a secure lockdown. And the upper mesh provides a snug, adaptable fit without sacrificing breathability.
The 1080 has a 8mm drop from heel to toe. It helps maintain a responsive toe-off, especially for runners transitioning from heel to midfoot or forefoot strikes. The 880 FuelCell foam in the forefoot delivers a more responsive, springy feel, providing a quicker toe-off and adding energy return to each step. Kind of like a better pickup in vehicles. 10mm drop from heel to toe which is a traditional running shoe drop, which provides extra heel cushioning and makes it suitable for runners who tend to heel strike. That was just a slight introduction to the terminology. Now we will delve into the actual differences between the two.
Major Differences
- Cushioning: The 880 is a step ahead because of the dual-cushioning system. Doesn’t make it more of an attractive purchase, just serves a different purpose. A balanced cushioning system that isn’t as plush as the 1080 but is still comfortable and versatile. As mentioned before, 880 is designed to be more of an all-purpose trainer, offering a balance between cushioning and responsiveness for daily runs and varied workouts.
- Responsiveness: The 880 triumphs in this one as well because of the dual cushioning system.
- Fit: The 1080 is slightly roomier than the 880 which is preferable for a tighter fit.
- Support and Stability: 1080 focuses on comfort rather than support while it’s the opposite with the 880.
Overall, we’d advise to choose the New Balance 880 if you prefer a more versatile, responsive shoe that can handle a variety of runs and workouts, offering a balance between cushioning and performance. We are well aware of the grip, stability, ankle support that is required during trekking varied terrains. The 880 would be a good companion for these types of walks. For long-distance runners who prioritize cushioning and comfort over responsiveness the 1080 is perfect for slower-paced, recovery runs, or for people who need extra shock absorption, especially during long hiking sessions on harder surfaces.
User Feedback | 880 vs 1080
So what’s the majority of the user feedback looking like? Users are highly appreciative about the wide toe box, the cushioning, UltraHeel and the responsiveness. Some state that the 1080 v13 fresh foam X completely outranks the Adidas boost tech and even the Hoka Bondi. They say these are the perfect shoes if you are always on the go and standing most of the day. Also great for lengthy morning runs. Many runners who suffer from knee or foot issues, such as plantar fasciitis, highlight how the 1080’s cushioning helps reduce pain during runs. A few reviewers mention that while the 1080 is cushioned, it lacks the responsiveness or “bounce” needed for faster runs or tempo workouts. But then again it is clear that the purpose is for comfort and long-distance runs.
No less better for the 880. Customers from all over the world got nothing but positivity all over. Especially the balance of cushioning in the 880, noting that it’s soft enough for longer runs without being overly plush and also has great shock absorption. Additionally, the users are praising the breathable fabric keeping the feet cool in warmer conditions, the snug fit, good grip in all surface types and the durable outsole which holds up well even after miles of use.
The irony of it is that the plus point is also a drawback for some. Meaning some runners who prefer more cushioned shoes, like the New Balance 1080, found the 880 to be a bit firmer than expected. A few others noted that the break in time is a little longer to feel fully comfortable and the midfoot is a little less spacious for those with wider feet.
Overall, both the models have gained enormous popularity with all things considered. The only real downside is the weight and the slightly higher price. However, we don’t necessarily think that the price should be a limiting factor here given the value offered.
